After several interaction with pupils and students (especially students), some of them feel to threatened by examination. Seem majority of them do not like it, some will even tell you that, teachers(some) set it to kill them (that’s the lang they use).
The question is:
ARE EXAMINATIONS A FAIR TEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE?
That there must be some measurement or ‘yardstick’ when judging proficiency is universally agreed. The fact that an individual thinks that he had mastered a certain subject or craft is not in itself enough. There must be some outside impersonal test so that other people like school heads or prospective employers can know too. Hence, examinations of all kinds are a traditional part of educational policy in both the world, from the age of ten when selection is made from primary to secondary education, right up to Ordinary Level Certificate Examinations and on to advanced degree course, examinations are set and must be taken in specific subjects and periods or work. Not only are examinations given in theoretical subjects, practical courses ain’t excluded.
![](https://theacademicbuilders.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/images-1759082142.jpeg)
Great care is always given by educational establishments to the preparation for examinations. The required and suitable text-books are always covered and “mock” examination and revision are extensively given. The quality of the teaching is generally high. This is important, because all learning, particularly for examinations is two way combination of the efforts of both the teacher and the pupil/student. The pupil/student must, of course, do the necessary work and committing to memory and if he had done so, then he should be able to pass the examination for which he and his teacher have been working.
Examining bodies are fair. They are not the natural enemies of the candidate and are not out either to “trap” or “trick” them. Hence, in all subjects a very wide choice of topics is almost invariably given. This, of course, is a considerable help to the candidate because out of such a choice, there are almost certain to be several questions that he can answer really well.
Facts speak for themselves and it is true that successful people do not criticize the system. it is the failures who do and who say that examinations are not a fair test of knowledge. The truth is that the failures have not done a sufficient amount of work and even they, it must be remembered are always given a second chance !
The real criticism may be that examinations take no account of the human factor.
It is human beings who take them and therefore, human failings and limitations are bound to enter into any assessment of the problem.
There is first of all, the very nervous student who may well have learnt the work, attended all the classes and used his brain. Indeed, he may have a very bright brain, capable of original thought as well as of dedication to learning. And yet despite all this, if in the examination room, he really is frightened and “overcome” with nerves, then facts and opinions may well leave his head entirely. His mind will be a blank in extreme cases. For such people, the examination would not be a fair test, but fortunately such people are rare !
Equally human illnesses must be taken into account. A headache, a common cold, minor in themselves can upset a candidate’s entire equilibrium. An ‘upset’ at home, a quarrel with a relationship partner, death of a loved one– all these things can “put a candidate off” and on the examination day contribute to his not doing his best. The fact that some examinations are given when the children are too young and before their mind is fully developed, mature and retentive is another argument against their fairness. This applies particularly to the ones taken between the ages of seven and ten the results of which, educationally, decide the child’s future.
Some educational authorities, realizing the possible unfairness of selection at so early an age have devised an alternative which could apply to other types of examinations as well. The alternative is an assessment by teachers and tutors of semester work and general capabilities. Both of these are open to abuse. Semester work can be copied from books and teachers and tutors can allow personal likes and dislikes to influence their judgment. A really good alternative to examinations has not yet been found, but our present system despite its minor faults is fair and has the approval of wise educational bodies throughout the world
GOOD OR BAD? YOUR CHOICE
Examination is a word that causes sleepless nights, a word that can change a cheerful person into a nervous wreck.
Consider this: An examination is a detailed inspection or analysis of an object or person. For example, an engineer will examine a structure, like a bridge, to see if it is safe. A doctor may conduct a medical examination to gauge whether a patient is healthy. In the school context, it is the students who take the examinations. These are usually a series of comprehensive tests held at the end of each term, year or in the case of professional examinations, after a few years.
One of the main purposes of school examinations is to improve the quality of education. From the results of the examinations, the teachers and planners of the curriculum will be able to gauge the extent to which the students have acquired the knowledge and skills of the course material. This would, first of all, provide an evaluation of their teaching methods, so they can improve them, if necessary.
Examinations are also used as a yardstick for measuring the capability of the candidate, for further education or employment. For example, examination results are the main criteria when selecting students for entrance into universities. It is assumed that the examination results would indicate whether or not the student will be able to handle the course. In the case of employment, it is felt that the examination results will indicate whether or not the job seeker has the skills or intelligence to handle the job.
However, does the school examination system provide an accurate yardstick of the candidate’s ability? Albert Einstein, at the age of 16, took the entrance exam to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, but failed and so was rejected by this elite school. Yet, Einstein went on to develop the theory of relativity and quantum theory, winning the Nobel Prize in Physics at the age of 42. Other examples of famous achievers who failed in school examinations would include Thomas Edison and Bill Gates, among others.
One may also question whether the present examination system results in better teaching in schools. In fact, some teachers are so pressured to produce good examination results that they are forced to practise poor teaching methods. They may race through the syllabus, ignoring the fact that the weaker students have not grasped some of the concepts. Some other teachers may concentrate on popular examination topics, ignoring the topics which are rarely tested in the examinations.
Pressure to succeed in examinations may also be detrimental to the students. They may be so filled with anxiety and stress that they do not enjoy their school years. They may be studying only to get good examination results, rather than a sound education. Some of the weaker students, who cannot seem to achieve good examination results, may lose interest in their studies. In extreme cases, students may be so frustrated or disappointed in their results that they may consider ending their lives.
I realise that examinations are necessary and useful in many areas of our lives. However, within the school system, they should be given less emphasis or conducted in a different way. Furthermore, educationists, employers and students themselves should be reminded that examination results may not provide the best assessment of an individual’s talents and capabilities.
EXAMINATION RESULTS VS EMPLOYMENT
![](https://theacademicbuilders.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/student-chewing-pencil-at-exam-desk418934376.jpg)
I feel that today it is no longer real merit which helps one in landing a good job: rather it is the grade one has secured in an examination. Not only the degrees have multiplied over the years but the possible areas of specialization have also increased. A look at job adverts is an educative experience. The various openings are for men and women who have successfully gained a large number of qualifications. It is imperative for one to have had a consistently bright academic record. A prospective candidate feels he has lost the chance even before having been fairly tried because the paper qualifications stand between him and the final interview.
It is easy enough to guess the way the employers think. They feel that anyone who has had the courage and determination to slog for long hours has proved his capacity for hard work. In the process, they assume, he has also proved his sense of responsibility and reliability. Thus the candidate’s seriousness of purpose stands him in good stead.
But would it not be worthwhile to examine the other side of the case? The person who has slogged hard has perhaps lost all his initiative and has not allowed his imagination scope to develop. In order to be a good examinee one may have to wear blinkers, give up all extra-curricular and time-consuming activities and thus develop a lopsided personality. The qualities required for a good examinee do not always go to make a good administrator or officer or technician.
Firms, employment agencies and prospective employers who attach a great deal of importance to examination results are mistaken in their assessment of the examination system. A written examination is by no means a full proof test of a person’s intelligence. The syllabus seldom changes and in certain cases the questions tend to follow a set pattern. The examination system, besides being subject to many vagaries, leads to memorizing by students. On the other hand, a candidate who may not have fared well where marks and percentage are concerned, may have a fully developed, rich personality. Instead of selecting a few important topics he might have worked hard over the whole syllabus: instead of memorizing, he might have understood and grasped the course. What is more important is his involvement in extra-curricular activities which would have been more sincere and genuine.
The main purpose of education is to teach one how to think, how to act, to develop one’s initiative and to be able to take decisions. In fact, education equips us for facing life, for solving and braving the problems which may confront us from day to day. To link education solely to the examination grades is to distort its meaning, to falsify its essence, and to prove our own inadequacy in such matters.
Many businessmen with great acumen have had no formal training in the trade they pursue, many able administrators may not have had much success in examinations. School dropouts and delinquents have often risen to meet a challenge much more strongly than successful examinees. In many a village in the corners of Nigeria, it is still possible to come across old men and women who store the wisdom of the ages. In today’s world the educational system need not necessarily inculcate sound moral values, and examinations are in no way a real test of brilliance. If I were to choose people it would not bother me how well they have performed in the various examinations, but my concern would be to discover how much they know of their subject and how quick and alert they are in their responses and the way they react to a problem. Thus the interview should be the proper base for selection and not the grading in the examination though it has to be conceded that the minimum grade should have been obtained.
FINAL NOTE
Examinations are like running a race. It is not always the one who deserves that wins. Some proper training is indeed essential for passing examinations well. With all one’s innate intelligence one may require proper guidance. Some grasp quickly and can do further work by themselves. These ere people with high intelligent quotient. Average people can surely succeed in examinations with positive help. It is something like oiling the wheel. One may know the answer but how it is put and presented makes a lot of difference. Experienced people may show the way. Hence nowadays people seek even outside guidance by having private tuition at home or joining an institute giving expert tuition.
Of course, parents can help; especially in the primary classes. They should be ready to help and also urge their children to do the task but patiently help along.
Teachers should be willing to help whenever they are approached by any student who needs their sincere assistance.
Friends should compare notes and help one another. Take down notes from reference books and discuss them. Forming a team and with a competitive spirit prepare for any examination.
Examination is good but does not show the real ability of a person.